Question about Fuji FinePix 2600 Zoom Digital Camera
I have just installed Fuji update 3.1 B for HS-V2. First impressions (still subjective) - significantly improved picture quality at low ISO (I've tested at 100). After High speed conversion it stands PS USM of 500/0.4/0 very well with artifacts compared with PS ACR 2.4 conversion. It performs well even with Very High Quality conversion at ISO 100. Nothing to say it still converts both S & R pixels :) Now my processor is occupied by GF Print Pro 4.0 500% picture inflating. It takes about an hour for 12Mp 16 bit picture to be processed using Athlon 2600+ and 1.5 G Dual Chanel RAM. Don't hesitate to try this upgrade. Highly recommended!
Posted by Anonymous on
But actually here was some rumour last Ocktober or November, that the RAW conveter was not ready yet, and that was the reason why they did not ship S3 earlier. This might be the reason after all (the last 2-3 months delay, did not ship in September as they said in summer), considering the image quality the 3.0 version had (vs. ACR 2.4 non official). Could you post some 100% crops of both (v3.1B and ACR 2.4), with best quality setting.
Posted on Sep 04, 2005
Tips for a great answer:
What is observed from the web camera to an extent is traceable to the manufacturers. For example, ascertain the features with which camera attains functionality. Manufacturer design specifications include providing features among mentionable as pixel definition where black or white captures are mentionable examples. Referring to the devices user guide acquires requisite feature functionalities attainable from device cameras. Alternately, the camera has means to capture images from which attain innovativeness within studio environments. For example, computer web cameras capture images least with an improved definition. However, the computers programs also known as multimedia software's provides means to adjustment requirements. Ascertain from prior installed programs on computer to discover alternate means to redesigning an impressive picture captured on web cameras. For example, already present on computers as manufactures default are multimedia programs either as audio or video editors that make picture graphs manipulatable. Prior to requesting media manipulation, ascertain that computer has an extensive multimedia capacity either as camera connections, media editors also circumpectively known as compatibility requirements. Media impressions are attainable either as prior innovation on the camera from which has examples of pixel definitions among features provided from devices manufacturer. Alternately, capture devices least with the feature functions as manufacturers default has means to remodification already mentioned as studio practices. Media either video graphic of picture graphic is modifiable or readjsutble with establishment structures only mentioned as computers also within structures from where experts perform conveniently. Refer with photographer studio experts about acquiring an improved multimedia experience. Significant details include recognizing the various media structures where multimedia establishments that perform either picture graphic as specialized from video graphic expertise.
Usually answered in minutes!