Question about Enco 72"84" RANGE PI TAPE PRC DIAMETER TAPE

Ad

Hello. Ensuring accuracy with a new unit should not be necessary. All Pi-Tape pruducts are:

"delivered with a Calibration Report traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology and all calibrations are performed in accordance with ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994, ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 10012-1, MIL-STD 45662A and 10CFR, part 21."

If the unit is second hand, the only real way to ensure accuracy is to verify the unit with a second calibrated vernier, or actually have it calibrated. Pi-Tape has a calibration lab. The link to contact them is: http://www.pitape.com/contactus.htm

Lots of other good info here as well. Hope this helps out.

Richard

Posted on Mar 22, 2011

Ad

Hi there,

Save hours of searching online or wasting money on unnecessary repairs by talking to a 6YA Expert who can help you resolve this issue over the phone in a minute or two.

Best thing about this new service is that you are never placed on hold and get to talk to real repairmen in the US.

Here's a link to this great service

Good luck!

Posted on Jan 02, 2017

Ad

You need to send it out to the manufacture and have it recalibrated. Hence the code RCAL.

Feb 24, 2017 | Pocket Health & Beauty

If your scale is not accurate and it's new, your should claim your warranty.

It it's old, get a new one

It it's old, get a new one

May 21, 2015 | Health & Beauty

This is a never ending argument for an infinite number. But if you want the first 100,000 digits, try this: http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/digits.html

In August 2010, a new record was set by Shigeru Kondo who managed to calculate 5,000,000,000,000 digits of Pi, using programmer Alexander Yee's y-cruncher. The calculation was carried out on a home-built computer with the two rounds of verifications taking just 64 and 66 hours to complete.

In August 2010, a new record was set by Shigeru Kondo who managed to calculate 5,000,000,000,000 digits of Pi, using programmer Alexander Yee's y-cruncher. The calculation was carried out on a home-built computer with the two rounds of verifications taking just 64 and 66 hours to complete.

Mar 03, 2015 | Office Equipment & Supplies

Do you have a biomedical group in your facility or somebody who's responsible for maintaining your equipment? If you do, they should have a photo-tachometer. They can place a piece of reflective tape onto the rotor to get you the true rpm speed. You probably need an accurate speed anyway to ensure proper rcf for your samples.

Dec 17, 2013 | Fisher Fischer Scientific 225 Cat...

if you are timing the engine, you always set it to TDC. the timing vernier scale is only to check for advance when the engine is running

Jan 23, 2013 | 1995 Toyota 4Runner

You are not using the right units. The integrals of functions involving angles (trigonometric functions) that you find in tables and other refrerences are valid only for the natural angle unit which is the radian. With any other angle unit (degree, gradian) there is a scale factor to take into account. That is the factor yoy are complaining about.

If it were not the case, the same integral will have two different values depending on the unit you use: and that cannot be.

If you want the calculator to give you the standard integrals in reference tables you must set the default angle unit to be radian.

Let x_deg be an angle in degrees and x_rad the corresponding value in radians.

180 deg=Pi rad

x_deg/180=x_rad/Pi

x_deg =(180 deg/PI)*x_rad

calculating the differentials of bot sides you obtain

dx_deg= (180/Pi) dx_rad

Similarly, with grads

dx_gr=(200/Pi)*dx_rad

If it were not the case, the same integral will have two different values depending on the unit you use: and that cannot be.

If you want the calculator to give you the standard integrals in reference tables you must set the default angle unit to be radian.

Let x_deg be an angle in degrees and x_rad the corresponding value in radians.

180 deg=Pi rad

x_deg/180=x_rad/Pi

x_deg =(180 deg/PI)*x_rad

calculating the differentials of bot sides you obtain

dx_deg= (180/Pi) dx_rad

Similarly, with grads

dx_gr=(200/Pi)*dx_rad

Sep 20, 2011 | Texas Instruments TI-89 Calculator

Very few electronic scales are accurate as they are a function of a resistance measured against a voltage. They may be accurate when you buy them, but over time the electronic components decay and read differently as the components are cheap 10% type resistors and capacitors and cannot hold their specific values over time.

If you want accuracy, you will have to get a balance type scale that can be calibrated on site.

If you want accuracy, you will have to get a balance type scale that can be calibrated on site.

May 17, 2011 | Taylor & Digital Scale Lithium Scale

Either a Vernier caliper or a micrometer.

Nov 09, 2009 | Measuring Tools & Sensors

This link allows you to trouble shoot directly with the company...
I hope this helps.
http://www.taylorusa.com/advantage/root/contact.html

Nov 10, 2008 | Taylor 7321 400 Pound Lithium Scale

Like all body fat tests, body fat scales don't actually measure your body fat percentage. They determine your body density. The examiner (or the scales) then uses a formula to calculate body fat percentage based on body density. These formulas just predict your body fat. Unfortunately there is no one formula that accurately predicts body fat for the whole population. Differences in age, gender, ethnicity, body size, and fitness level all have a significant affect on the results. Well, whether body fat scales measure your "true" body fat percentage or not doesn't matter! As long as they can accurately monitor changes in your body composition over time, that's all you need.

Aug 27, 2008 | Detecto DR150 Low Profile Digital Platform...

Jun 13, 2018 | Briggs Measuring Tools & Sensors

313 people viewed this question

Usually answered in minutes!

×