Question about The Learning Company Achieve! Math & Science Grades 1-3 (381933) for PC, Mac

Ad

61/82 is already reduced to lowest terms since 61 and 82 have no factors in common (other than 1). In fact 61 is a prime number so it has no factors other than 1 and 61.

Posted on Nov 07, 2014

Ad

Hi,

a 6ya expert can help you resolve that issue over the phone in a minute or two.

Best thing about this new service is that you are never placed on hold and get to talk to real repairmen in the US.

the service is completely free and covers almost anything you can think of.(from cars to computers, handyman, and even drones)

click here to download the app (for users in the US for now) and get all the help you need.

Goodluck!

Posted on Jan 02, 2017

Ad

SOURCE: 61/82 as a fraction reduced to lowest fraction

Hello,

This fraction is already reduced to its simplest form because 61 is a prime number: a number that can only be divided by itself and by 1.

Hope it clarifies things.

Posted on Sep 07, 2009

Testimonial: *"thanks a bunch! unfortunately i am an adult working on basic math, using math.com online.Somehing tells me its gonna be a long drive."*

9/500 you get it by putting 18 divided by 1000( 1 and 3 decimal places )and reducing down to its lowest fraction

Nov 13, 2017 | Office Equipment & Supplies

Hi,

To do this on any calculator, enter the numerator and denominator of your mixed fraction, with a divide in between. I get 1.4. Next, take the decimal into a fraction and reduce it to lowest terms. In this case, 0.4 converts to 4/10 which reduces to 2/5. Putting the two pieces together, we get 1 and 2/5.

Good luck.

Paul

To do this on any calculator, enter the numerator and denominator of your mixed fraction, with a divide in between. I get 1.4. Next, take the decimal into a fraction and reduce it to lowest terms. In this case, 0.4 converts to 4/10 which reduces to 2/5. Putting the two pieces together, we get 1 and 2/5.

Good luck.

Paul

Jun 24, 2015 | Office Equipment & Supplies

To convert a fraction to lowest terms, we must divide the numerator (the top number) and the denominator (the bottom number) by a common number until we can't reduce it any more. A method for doing this is to factor the numerator and denominator by their common factors.

So let's factor 711 and 22.

1 x 711

9 x 79

3 x 3 x 79

I don't think I can factor 79. We should check the numbers from 2 up to the square root of 79, or approximately 9.

Factoring 22,

1 x 22

2 x 11

Unfortunately, none of the factors of 711 are common with the factors of 22, so it is already in its lowest terms, and cannot be reduced.

Good luck,

Paul

So let's factor 711 and 22.

1 x 711

9 x 79

3 x 3 x 79

I don't think I can factor 79. We should check the numbers from 2 up to the square root of 79, or approximately 9.

Factoring 22,

1 x 22

2 x 11

Unfortunately, none of the factors of 711 are common with the factors of 22, so it is already in its lowest terms, and cannot be reduced.

Good luck,

Paul

Apr 09, 2015 | Office Equipment & Supplies

This answer is correct. 4/12 divided by 2/2= 1/3

The reciprocal of 2/2 is 2/2

Then you multiply straight across and reduce to get 1/3

The reciprocal of 2/2 is 2/2

Then you multiply straight across and reduce to get 1/3

Mar 01, 2015 | Miscellaneous

83/360 is already reduced to lowest terms since 83 and 360 have no factors in common (other than 1).

Feb 27, 2013 | Texas Instruments TI-86 Calculator

First divide top and bottom by 10.

This converts the fraction to 58/114.

Next divide top and bottom by 2.

This converts the fraction to 29/57.

Since 29 is a prime number this is as far as this fraction can be reduced.

So the answer is 29/57.

This converts the fraction to 58/114.

Next divide top and bottom by 2.

This converts the fraction to 29/57.

Since 29 is a prime number this is as far as this fraction can be reduced.

So the answer is 29/57.

Sep 03, 2010 | SoftMath Algebrator - Algebra Homework...

Transforming 0.175 to fraction:

= 175/1,000

Reduce to lowest term (divide by 5 both the numerator and the denominator):

= 35/200

Reduce further by dividing both by 5:

= 7/40

This is the lowest terms now that it can't be reduced further.

The "Other" way round, Bottom number into ONE and multiply it by the Top. EG: 3/4 == 1 divided by 4 = 0.25, now we multiply, .25 by the Top number or in this case 3, that equals 0.75. 1/4 =0.25 x 3 = .75. 3/4 is the same as 0.75.

= 175/1,000

Reduce to lowest term (divide by 5 both the numerator and the denominator):

= 35/200

Reduce further by dividing both by 5:

= 7/40

This is the lowest terms now that it can't be reduced further.

The "Other" way round, Bottom number into ONE and multiply it by the Top. EG: 3/4 == 1 divided by 4 = 0.25, now we multiply, .25 by the Top number or in this case 3, that equals 0.75. 1/4 =0.25 x 3 = .75. 3/4 is the same as 0.75.

Feb 22, 2010 | Texas Instruments TI-30XA Calculator

If your calculator is configured to be in MthIO, the fraction that is displayed is always reduced to its simplest form. (The denominator is the smallest possible.)

If you are adding fractions, the result is also a fraction in its reduced form.

If you want to convert a fraction to a decimal number, press the [S<=>D] key.

To set MthIO: Press [SHIFT][MODE] (SetUp) and select [1:MthIO]

To set LineIO: Press [SHIFT][MODE](SetUp) and select [2:LineIO]

In LineIO, all results are expressed in decimal format.

If you are adding fractions, the result is also a fraction in its reduced form.

If you want to convert a fraction to a decimal number, press the [S<=>D] key.

To set MthIO: Press [SHIFT][MODE] (SetUp) and select [1:MthIO]

To set LineIO: Press [SHIFT][MODE](SetUp) and select [2:LineIO]

In LineIO, all results are expressed in decimal format.

Jan 26, 2010 | Casio FX-115ES Scientific Calculator

Hello,

This fraction is already reduced to its simplest form because 61 is a prime number: a number that can only be divided by itself and by 1.

Hope it clarifies things.

This fraction is already reduced to its simplest form because 61 is a prime number: a number that can only be divided by itself and by 1.

Hope it clarifies things.

Sep 07, 2009 | The Learning Company Achieve! Math &...

418 people viewed this question

Usually answered in minutes!

×