Question about Brother Computers & Internet

Ad

Hi,

a 6ya Technician can help you resolve that issue over the phone in a minute or two.

Best thing about this new service is that you are never placed on hold and get to talk to real repair professionals here in the US.

click here to Talk to a Technician (only for users in the US for now) and get all the help you need.

Goodluck!

Posted on Jan 02, 2017

Ad

It's a vertical line so the slope is infinite.

Mar 29, 2017 | Homework

Its' (0). What else? Are you mad?

Jul 18, 2016 | Office Equipment & Supplies

There are an infinite number of numbers that qualify. The smallest such positive number is 125. The next such number is 251.

Sep 29, 2014 | Office Equipment & Supplies

This calculator does not have a key that you can use to find the prime factor of an integer.

You can however use the calculator to find the factors

1.** If number is even divide it by 2**

Keep dividing by 2, while keeping track of how many times you divided by 2.

If you divided 5 times by 2 before getting an odd number, then your first factor is 2^5

2.**Now try dividing by 3**, keep track of the number of times you divided by 3 before you could not divide by 3 any more. If you divided 0 times by 3, your second factor is 3^0, or 1 and 3 is not a factor.

If you divided 4 times by 3, your second factor is 3^4

3.**Divide by 5,** until you can't any more. Keep track of the number of times you divided by 5.

4. Divide by all other prime numbers 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, etc. For each prime number, keep track of how many times you divided by it, until you could not any more.

**Example: 23100**

*Division by 2*

23100/2=11550 ---------> 1 division by 2

11550/2=5775 ----------> 2 divisions by 2

Note that 5775 is not divisible by 2.** No more divisions by 2. **

First factor is 2^2

*Division by 3:*

5775/3=1925 ----------> 1 division by 3

1925/3=641. 66667 Not an integer. No more divisions by 3.

**2nd factor is 3^1**

*Division by 5 (number ends in 5)*

1925/5 =385 -------> 1 division by 5

385/5=77 ----------> 2 divisions by 5 and no more (quotient does not end in 0 or 5)

**3rd factor is 5^2**

*Division by 7 *

77/7=11 --------> 1 division by 7, and no more

**4th factor is 7^1=7**

*Division by 11*

11/11=1

**5th factor is 11^1=11**

Assembling the factors 2^2, 3^1, 5^2, 7, 11

Prime factorization of 23100 is

**23100=(2^2)(3)(5^2)(7)11**

You can however use the calculator to find the factors

1.

Keep dividing by 2, while keeping track of how many times you divided by 2.

If you divided 5 times by 2 before getting an odd number, then your first factor is 2^5

2.

If you divided 4 times by 3, your second factor is 3^4

3.

4. Divide by all other prime numbers 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, etc. For each prime number, keep track of how many times you divided by it, until you could not any more.

23100/2=11550 ---------> 1 division by 2

11550/2=5775 ----------> 2 divisions by 2

Note that 5775 is not divisible by 2.

First factor is 2^2

5775/3=1925 ----------> 1 division by 3

1925/3=641. 66667 Not an integer. No more divisions by 3.

1925/5 =385 -------> 1 division by 5

385/5=77 ----------> 2 divisions by 5 and no more (quotient does not end in 0 or 5)

77/7=11 --------> 1 division by 7, and no more

11/11=1

Assembling the factors 2^2, 3^1, 5^2, 7, 11

Prime factorization of 23100 is

Dec 18, 2013 | Texas Instruments TI-30XA Calculator

There would be 0 remainders because 17 divided by 0 yields "does not exist"

Aug 12, 2011 | Office Equipment & Supplies

20 divided by 28 equals:

5 / 7

or

0.714285714285714285...

Notice the infinitely repeating sequence (714285).

5 / 7

or

0.714285714285714285...

Notice the infinitely repeating sequence (714285).

Apr 23, 2011 | Texas Instruments TI-83 Plus Calculator

To do this calculation on a Canon P23-DHV Calculator press [1] [0] [0] [(divide)] [.] [0] [4] [=] this should give you

2,500.

2,500.

Mar 17, 2011 | Canon P23-DHV Calculator

-15x^4 / 3x = -5x³ for x 0.

You should be able to figure this out without having to resort to a calculator. Note the "for x 0"... the two functions are identical everywhere, except the -15x^4 / 3x version is undefined for x = 0 (3 times 0 is 0 and you cannot divide by 0). The function has a "hole" at this point. -5x³ does not suffer from this defect, for x=0 it simply evaluates to 0, so you have to mention this fact to make it proper.

You should be able to figure this out without having to resort to a calculator. Note the "for x 0"... the two functions are identical everywhere, except the -15x^4 / 3x version is undefined for x = 0 (3 times 0 is 0 and you cannot divide by 0). The function has a "hole" at this point. -5x³ does not suffer from this defect, for x=0 it simply evaluates to 0, so you have to mention this fact to make it proper.

Jan 07, 2011 | Casio FX-9860G Slim Graphic Calculator

This is from wikipedia:

When division is explained at the elementary arithmetic level, it is often considered as a description of dividing a set of objects into equal parts. As an example, consider having ten apples, and these apples are to be distributed equally to five people at a table. Each person would receive = 2 apples. Similarly, if there are 10 apples, and only one person at the table, that person would receive = 10 apples.

So for dividing by zero - what is the number of apples that each person receives when 10 apples are evenly distributed amongst 0 people? Certain words can be pinpointed in the question to highlight the problem. The problem with this question is the "when". There is no way to distribute 10 apples amongst 0 people. In mathematical jargon, a set of 10 items cannot be partitioned into 0 subsets. So , at least in elementary arithmetic, is said to be meaningless, or undefined.

Similar problems occur if we have 0 apples and 0 people, but this time the problem is in the phrase "**the** number". A partition is possible (of a set with 0 elements into 0 parts), but since the partition has 0 parts, vacuously every set in our partition has a given number of elements, be it 0, 2, 5, or 1000. If there are, say, 5 apples and 2 people, the problem is in "evenly distribute". In any integer partition of a 5-set into 2 parts, one of the parts of the partition will have more elements than the other.

In all of the above three cases, , and , one is asked to consider an impossible situation before deciding what the answer will be, and that is why the operations are undefined in these cases.

To understand division by zero, we must check it with multiplication: multiply the quotient by the divisor to get the original number. However, no number multiplied by zero will produce a product other than zero. To satisfy division by zero, the quotient must be bigger than all other numbers, i.e., infinity. This connection of division by zero to infinity takes us beyond elementary arithmetic (see below).

A recurring theme even at this elementary stage is that for every undefined arithmetic operation, there is a corresponding question that is not well-defined. "How many apples will each person receive under a fair distribution of ten apples amongst three people?" is a question that is not well-defined because there can be no fair distribution of ten apples amongst three people.

There is another way, however, to explain the division: if we want to find out how many people, who are satisfied with half an apple, can we satisfy by dividing up one apple, we divide 1 by 0.5. The answer is 2. Similarly, if we want to know how many people, who are satisfied with nothing, can we satisfy with 1 apple, we divide 1 by 0. The answer is infinite; we can satisfy infinite people, that are satisfied with nothing, with 1 apple.

Clearly, we cannot extend the operation of division based on the elementary combinatorial considerations that first define division, but must construct new number systems.

[edit]

Oct 08, 2010 | Puzzle Massey Ferguson Tractor

It would be "cheating" for anybody to do your "homework" from your computer-mathematics class, unless you submit your answer, saying that an EXPERT on FIXYA did all the work on your behalf.

Apr 14, 2009 | Microsoft Windows XP Professional With...

Dec 28, 2017 | Brother Computers & Internet

53 people viewed this question

Usually answered in minutes!

×