Question about Casio fx-300ES Calculator

Ad

Enter a number

Press [STO] [A] to store it in memory A

To recall a number from memory A, press [RCL] A

You do not need to press the [ALPHA] key to get the A,B,C,D,X.Y or M

Posted on May 25, 2010

Ad

Hi,

a 6ya expert can help you resolve that issue over the phone in a minute or two.

best thing about this new service is that you are never placed on hold and get to talk to real repairmen in the US.

the service is completely free and covers almost anything you can think of (from cars to computers, handyman, and even drones).

click here to download the app (for users in the US for now) and get all the help you need.

goodluck!

Posted on Jan 02, 2017

Ad

I want to take you through the steps of rounding so that you can do it with this number, and any other number.

Step 1 - Find the column in question.

Step 2 - Look to the number immediately to the right of this number.

Step 3 - If this number is great than or equal to 5, add 1 to the column in question.

Step 4 - If this number is 4 or less, don't add the 1

Step 5 - Since this number is to the left of the decimal, make all numbers to the right of this number a 0.

Using the example provided of 87,147 to the nearest hundred.

The hundreds column is the third column to the left of the decimal. Ones, Tens, Hundreds. In this case, the 1.

The number immediately to the right of this number is 4.

This number is 4 or less, so we don't add 1 to the hundreds column.

We set all numbers to the column in question to be 0.

I get 87,100.

Good luck.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Paul

Step 1 - Find the column in question.

Step 2 - Look to the number immediately to the right of this number.

Step 3 - If this number is great than or equal to 5, add 1 to the column in question.

Step 4 - If this number is 4 or less, don't add the 1

Step 5 - Since this number is to the left of the decimal, make all numbers to the right of this number a 0.

Using the example provided of 87,147 to the nearest hundred.

The hundreds column is the third column to the left of the decimal. Ones, Tens, Hundreds. In this case, the 1.

The number immediately to the right of this number is 4.

This number is 4 or less, so we don't add 1 to the hundreds column.

We set all numbers to the column in question to be 0.

I get 87,100.

Good luck.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Paul

Apr 07, 2016 | Office Equipment & Supplies

that computer is not wifi enabled,it uses a usb cable,heres all the manuals,

http://www.usa.canon.com/cpr/pdf/Brochures/i470D_spec.pdf

Canon Support Drivers i470D

http://www.usa.canon.com/cpr/pdf/Brochures/i470D_spec.pdf

Canon Support Drivers i470D

May 30, 2015 | Canon i 470D InkJet Printer

Since the y-variable is isolated in both equations, set the two right sides of the equations equal

x^2-7x+4=-8x^2+56x-86

Combine all like terms on one side of the equal sign

9x^2-63x+90=0. factor out the 9 to get** 9(x^2-7x+10)=0**

Now solve the equation**(x^2-7x+10)=0**. The solutions are x=5 and x=2

Calculate the y-value tof be y=-6

The two solutions are**(2,-6) and (5,-6)**

Graphically, here is how the two curves intersect. One intersection point in the screen capture is (2,-6). You can read that the other intersection point is (5,-6)

x^2-7x+4=-8x^2+56x-86

Combine all like terms on one side of the equal sign

9x^2-63x+90=0. factor out the 9 to get

Now solve the equation

Calculate the y-value tof be y=-6

The two solutions are

Graphically, here is how the two curves intersect. One intersection point in the screen capture is (2,-6). You can read that the other intersection point is (5,-6)

Mar 03, 2014 | Office Equipment & Supplies

**Solve (***x*+ 2)(*x*+ 3) = 12.

- It is very common for students to see this type
of problem, and say:

solve to get x = 10 and x = 9. That was easy!"

So, tempting though it may be, I cannot set each of the factors above equal to the other side of the equation and "solve". Instead, I first have to multiply out and simplify the left-hand side, then subtract the 12 over to the left-hand side, and re-factor. Only then can I solve.

- (

(

Jul 17, 2011 | H. B. Enterprises Quadratic Solver

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

153

370

371

407

1634

8208

9474

54748

92727

93084

548834

Jan 06, 2011 | Computers & Internet

Do you need help doing your homework?

If so, here's a first attempt. It may be correct, and it may not be.

It's up to you to understand the process, and to make any needed corrections.

X minus 11 equals Y.

So, X is larger than Y.

So, 3 times X minus 33 equals 3 times Y.

Thus 3 times X equals 3 times Y plus 33.

Also, 3 times X minus 4 equals 4 times Y.

So, (3 times Y plus 33) minus 4 equals 4 times Y.

Thus 0 times Y plus 29 equals 1 times Y.

So, Y equals -27.

If so, here's a first attempt. It may be correct, and it may not be.

It's up to you to understand the process, and to make any needed corrections.

X minus 11 equals Y.

So, X is larger than Y.

So, 3 times X minus 33 equals 3 times Y.

Thus 3 times X equals 3 times Y plus 33.

Also, 3 times X minus 4 equals 4 times Y.

So, (3 times Y plus 33) minus 4 equals 4 times Y.

Thus 0 times Y plus 29 equals 1 times Y.

So, Y equals -27.

Dec 10, 2010 | Computers & Internet

It appears to be an Hexadecimal number and the value is 10.

Hex Dec

01 = 1

05 = 5

09 = 9

0A = 10

0B = 11

0C = 12

0D = 13

0E = 14

0F = 15

10 = 16

11 = 17

Hex Dec

01 = 1

05 = 5

09 = 9

0A = 10

0B = 11

0C = 12

0D = 13

0E = 14

0F = 15

10 = 16

11 = 17

Nov 25, 2010 | Computers & Internet

This is from wikipedia:

When division is explained at the elementary arithmetic level, it is often considered as a description of dividing a set of objects into equal parts. As an example, consider having ten apples, and these apples are to be distributed equally to five people at a table. Each person would receive = 2 apples. Similarly, if there are 10 apples, and only one person at the table, that person would receive = 10 apples.

So for dividing by zero - what is the number of apples that each person receives when 10 apples are evenly distributed amongst 0 people? Certain words can be pinpointed in the question to highlight the problem. The problem with this question is the "when". There is no way to distribute 10 apples amongst 0 people. In mathematical jargon, a set of 10 items cannot be partitioned into 0 subsets. So , at least in elementary arithmetic, is said to be meaningless, or undefined.

Similar problems occur if we have 0 apples and 0 people, but this time the problem is in the phrase "**the** number". A partition is possible (of a set with 0 elements into 0 parts), but since the partition has 0 parts, vacuously every set in our partition has a given number of elements, be it 0, 2, 5, or 1000. If there are, say, 5 apples and 2 people, the problem is in "evenly distribute". In any integer partition of a 5-set into 2 parts, one of the parts of the partition will have more elements than the other.

In all of the above three cases, , and , one is asked to consider an impossible situation before deciding what the answer will be, and that is why the operations are undefined in these cases.

To understand division by zero, we must check it with multiplication: multiply the quotient by the divisor to get the original number. However, no number multiplied by zero will produce a product other than zero. To satisfy division by zero, the quotient must be bigger than all other numbers, i.e., infinity. This connection of division by zero to infinity takes us beyond elementary arithmetic (see below).

A recurring theme even at this elementary stage is that for every undefined arithmetic operation, there is a corresponding question that is not well-defined. "How many apples will each person receive under a fair distribution of ten apples amongst three people?" is a question that is not well-defined because there can be no fair distribution of ten apples amongst three people.

There is another way, however, to explain the division: if we want to find out how many people, who are satisfied with half an apple, can we satisfy by dividing up one apple, we divide 1 by 0.5. The answer is 2. Similarly, if we want to know how many people, who are satisfied with nothing, can we satisfy with 1 apple, we divide 1 by 0. The answer is infinite; we can satisfy infinite people, that are satisfied with nothing, with 1 apple.

Clearly, we cannot extend the operation of division based on the elementary combinatorial considerations that first define division, but must construct new number systems.

[edit]

Oct 08, 2010 | Puzzle Massey Ferguson Tractor

Assuming that you eq is installed in your system correctly add a source like a cd of the type of music you will be putting through the system. Now starting at 0 on all frequencies adjust to your liking. Try to avoid going above 0 as much as possible because this will be adding to that particular frequency and could damage your speakers if done incorrectly.

If there is too much bass lower your sliders to the left. If there is not enough highs boost the sliders to the right up to about half way then start decreasing the bass to get the desired effect. Small increments is important.

I found that if you go to your local music store the people there are more than willing to help you.

If there is too much bass lower your sliders to the left. If there is not enough highs boost the sliders to the right up to about half way then start decreasing the bass to get the desired effect. Small increments is important.

I found that if you go to your local music store the people there are more than willing to help you.

Dec 31, 2009 | Peavey EQ215FX Home Equalizer

133 people viewed this question

Usually answered in minutes!

×