Related Tags:
This problem should be removed because:
Problem with Veritas Backup Executive V9.1 (696590036026) for PC
Store.exe High Memory Utilization
Hope someone can shed some light. Need to resolve an issue with a SBS 2000 running Exchange. Over the last week, the store.exe has been taking up over 3/4 of the memory available on the server, resulting in client access being extremely slow during login and accessing data files etc.. The dual processors are no being affected as CPU usgae is below 10%. Rebooted the server a couple of times, freeing up to 600MB but over night, store.exe takes up to 750MB away from the server. Available memory is under 50MB thus bringing the LAN to a grinding halt. I have applied [url=http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;322125]http://support.microsoft.com/d efault.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;3221 25[/url] But no success. Server has 1GB, running Symantec AntiVirus Corprate ED 7.5x and Veritas SBS v9.1 Build 4691.1
Solutions (5)
Best Solution
No luck with AV, overnight process store.exe peaked at
740MB and did not release memory until the server was
rebooted.
During the day store.exe 9-6pm eat about 40MB. Overnight
there is a service / applications that must trigger the
memory leak for store.exe to peak at 740MB and will not
release.
Anti Virus was disabled, only Veritas is running overnight.
Any one any ideas, other than possibly replacing the
memory?
problems, especially if
The best thing for you to get *conclusive* proof of what's going on is to
open a ticket with Microsoft Product Support Services. They'll get process
dumps of store.exe to find exactly what's causing the spikage and hang.
Regards,
Colby
--
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
I have been doing some testing to conclusively find what is triggering the
memory leak to store.exe which it does not relinquish.
1. Symantec Anti-virus diasbled only store.exe peaked -740MB.
2. Symantec Anti-virus & Veritas Back-Up Exec disabled, Information Store
maintainence between 1:00am-5:00am Store.exe peaks to 630MB.
3. Symantec Anti-virus & Information Store maintainence disabled, enabled
Veritas store.exe peaked 340MB
4. Information Store maintainence & Veritas Back-Up Exec disabled, Symantec
enabled store.exe peaked 64MB
Conclusion is that any process directly affecting store.exe such as Veritas
backing-up the Information Store / mailboxes and the Information Store
maintainence will attribute to store.exe peaking at high memory levels but
not relinquishing the memory afterwards.
The only way I have been able to get around this issue is to re-boot the
server every morning.
I see this as a software fault as I have also replaced the memory on the
server.
Is there anyone how could offer me conclusive advise on fixing this problem,
as most people are only dancing around the issue, which is by not doubt
reading on other forums and newsgroups a major issue at hand.
DBA is the algorithm that determines how large the database cache
should be. The cache should be as large as possible without making the
machine page to death. It generally works quite well. But it's not
perfect.
You're running Exchange 2000 as part of SBS 2000. That version had
some known problems with:
-Windows 2000 uniprocessor
-IIRC, Large file caches
You mention 'dual processors', so it's probably not the first problem.
The large file cache can be seen with taskmgr as 'System Cache' (I
think that's what it's called on Win2000 --- I don't have a Win2000
machine here to confirm/deny).
Why is the file cache large? Sometimes it happens if you're running it
as a file server. If you're using it as a file server, is it possible
to offload that onto a different machine?
BTW, you can just stop&restart the store service, you shouldn't need
to reboot.
Exchange 2003 has a better algorithm for determining the cache size,
although that doesn't help you much, since you're not using it.
-martin
Boring-but-necessary-disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with
no warranties, and confers no rights.
In article
Colby Holland [MSFT]
Test your server with AV completely out of the picture and see if that
helps. AV has been known to cause those sorts of problems, especially if
you're scanning Exchange drives, the M drive, etc.
C
--
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
-
-
Best article I have seen on the subject is located here: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2004/0...
-
-
MS Backup Options
Currently I'm using MS Backup from the windows XPHE version. This works fine for me but does not have a SW compression. Anybody knows...
-
Client Add-on Packs and ArcServe
I have recently installed 2 client add-on pack to SBS 4.5 (10 to 20). The installation went smoothly, but now I am unable to use ArcServe...
-
HP LTO Drive Firmware Revs For Veritas 9.1
Hi, I am an HP Customer Engineer that had to replace a Storageworks 1/8 tape autoloader (With LTO Ultrium-1 drive) for a customer...
-
veritas 9.01 problem
Need help to understand Veritas 9.01 back up system what way you suggest
Add Your Solution
-
We get several Alert messages every day, and it
We get several Alert messages every day, and it won't do a backup until we answer them.
-
backup
we back up our server monday thru friday, but for the last couple of weeks for some reason it will not back on friday (i...
-
"Unable to attach to one of the drives"
I have a good backup of Exchange 2003. I had to reinstall Server 2003 and now need to restore from backup. Continuously...
-
Trying to restore a single
Trying to restore a single test file using veritas backup.exe ver 9. The program starts 'loading media', but the ejects...
-
veritas restore cassete
hi how to restore files from my cassete back to the computer hard drive and i have error reports crc,change my ups...
See all Veritas Backup Executive V9.1 (696590036026) for Problems
Fix-O-Meter
21,225
21,225 people viewed this problem
- 1 person found this problem to be helpful.
- 0 people are following this problem. Be the first!
Verification:
Please enter the characters below to complete your post
Can't read it? Try a different one
