I own Fuji GX680 with 180 and 300 mm lenses as well as other accessories. Sometimes I feel I am not getting what I should from this expensive camera. For example, the same object shot with Nikon F4 appears better than the result from Fuji GX680. They say the lenses (Fujinon series) are excellent, but the sharpness of resulting images do not seem as they should be. I am not sure whether such results come from minute misadjustment in the lens attachment mechanism or whether they are the inherent limit of the lenses' resolution. I would like to communicate with photographers who own the same camera or have experiences with it, hear their opinions and improve my knowledge and skill if I am missing something. Please contact me through this group or, for continuous future contact, e-mail me. Thanks.
I also doubt the problem is with the glass. But why assume? Buy a test target on film and tape it to the film plane of your camera. Then take the lens out of a slide projector and use the projector as a light source to project the image of the test target through the camera lens. Compare the results with a test of another lens you have confidence in. I bought my 6x6cm test target from Four Designs, 9400 Wystone Ave, Northridge, CA in 1993. It is a multiple image of the 1951 USAF test target. You can determine resolution in terms of line-pairs per mm but you have to make your own subjective determination of pass/fail at any particular resolution level. This is the reason for the reference lens. Presumably you will apply the same subjective pass/fail criterion to both lenses.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #2
posted on Aug 09, 2005
Ross - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
But be sure to read the fine print. There are limitations that you should be aware of.
Regards
John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster http://www.darkroom-pro.com - http://www.darkroompro.net Formulas, Facts and Info on the Photographic Process ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 04:13:05 GMT, Pam Niedermayer
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #4
posted on Aug 09, 2005
Rogers - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Thanks for advice. According to Fuji Film web site, all repairs of GX680 appears to need to be shipped to New Jersy. I am a little apprehensive about shipping this expensive camera and accessories this far, though.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #5
posted on Aug 09, 2005
herself - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Consider sending it to Fuji's professional camera repair department. I had one repaired once and the price was very reasonable and of course the work was flawless. God Bless,
Don Allen http://www.DonAllen.net Photos + a large set of photo links including my PHOTO BOOK LIST - NOW WITH BOOK REVIEWS!!!!
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #6
posted on Aug 09, 2005
Jimmy NY - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Check if all tilt and shift controls are in their neutral positions (tilted lens *may* account for the lack of sharpness...) If they are - get the camera to a *qualified* repair technician. The focusing screen, the lens mount or the mirror may be misaligned, the focusing mechanism may need adjustments, or the entire mirror box has been moved (say, possible if the camera takes a hard fall...) There is also a possibility that the film magazine mount has been somehow moved, or that the pressure plate in the magazine is busted. In short - have the camera, all magazines, viewfinders AND lenses checked by a pro Fuji repair person.
I have neither heard of, nor experienced the type of problems you are reporting in many years of shooting catalog photos with the 680 Fuji. To the contrary - in terms of sharpness, contrast and the lack of internal flare the lenses for Fuji 680 are second to none IMO.
Michael
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #7
posted on Aug 09, 2005
Hart - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Thanks a lot to all who responded to my posting. Fuji GW680 is a kind of large-format camera except the film size, and the construction is completely different from that of Fuji 690 and accordingly uses lenses specifically designed for it.. Because of its heavy weight it is practically impossible to use it without putting it on a sturdy tripod. I usually use 5 m electronic release cable. So vibration should not be the problem. As Anthony Polson suggested, it is possible that the distance between the lense and the focussing screen and that for the film plane may not be set correctly so that precise focussing obtained on the screen is not transferred to the film plane when the mirror is lifted. There is practically no wiglling room for how to place a focussing screen. In my opinion, the mechanism to hold a focussing screen on the camera body is not very firm, perhaps a small sacrifice for quick change. I do not know, however, if this causes discrepancy in focussing between the screen and film plane. I wonder if the mirror's rotating axis might not be set or constructed correctly or if the mechanism to hold the mirror at the precise position when it is lifted might be loosened for some reason. If anyone owns this camera and experienced problems which might be ascribed to a mechanical construction such as above, please tell me about it and how it is dealt. Chiropter
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #8
posted on Aug 09, 2005
Bouncy - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
I agree with all the other raves about Fuji lenses. I've rented the 680 as well as a couple of 617's. I also own a 617 and a GW690II. Fuji lenses are the breathtakingly sharp.
The problem lies elsewhere.
Rob
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #9
posted on Aug 09, 2005
lawyer - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Have you checked the focus accuracy? A couple of ways to do this. One is to put a ground glass on the film plane and check the focus on the focus screen, then fire the shutter on bulb and check it at the film plane. Another is to set up something like several cards at different distances from the camera a few inches apart, then focus on the middel one and see if the middle one is in focus on film.
Are you sure it's not camera shake somehow?
As far as the lenses, I have a fuji 6X9 65mm GSW and have cropped a 35mm section from the center of the film and it's just as sharp if not sharper than GOOD olympus zuiko prime lenses. I'd be shocked if it was the glass.
--
Stephe
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Fuji GX680:
Solution #10
posted on Aug 09, 2005
Powe33 - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
There are several possible reasons, included among which are:
1) Your mirror needs re-setting by a competent repairer,
2) Your focusing screen is incorrectly seated,
3) Your eyesight is not what it used to be, <g>
4) You are in the habit of using over-wide apertures that offer little depth of field to cover small errors in focusing,
5) You are not able to hold the camera sufficiently steady (it is VERY heavy!) and/or you aren't using a tripod when you should, especially when using slower shutter speeds.
Try renting or borrowing a medium format AF SLR (Pentax, Contax, Mamiya) and use it on a tripod making sure you locate carefully the camera's focus point on the subject. If you find that the results are sharp you should address the problem areas I listed, one by one, until you identify the problem.
I hope this is useful. Good luck!
-- Best regards, Anthony Polson
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it: