Wheel size Calibration

ABS Module Calibration failure
the car needs to be
all brakes inspected good
and ABS scan tool scanned.
CAN Communication Bus Fault
can bus failures are not good. (and hard to find)
Read more: https://www.autocodes.com/u1900_lincoln.html

driver control module and its location ???? Never heard of a driver control module . Or do you mean driver seat module ?

these are the modules on that vehicle

Programmable Parameters Index Module Calibration Updatable PMI Programable Parameter Vehicle Security Module No Yes

• 4WD ESOF
• Remote Keyless Entry (RKE)
• Overspeed Warning
• Beltminder
• Transmission Type
• One Touch Down
• Delayed Accessory
• Vehicle Speed Conversion
• Heavy Truck Tachograph

Instrument CLuster No Yes

• Body Security Module Present
• Overspeed Warning
• Beltminder
• 4x4 Present
• Air Suspension Module Present
• Speedometer Bias
• Tire/Wheel Size

Anti-Lock Brake System (ABS) Module No Yes Tire/Wheel Size Overhead Trip Computer (OTC) No Yes

• Fuel Tank Size
• Dual Fuel Tank Configuration
• Dual Fuel Tank (Distance to Empty Display)
• EATC present

Restraints Control Module (RCM) No Yes

• With Driver Airbag and Pretensioner/Without Passenger Airbag and IPAD
• With Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Pretensioner and IPAD
• With Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag and Pretensioner/Without IPAD

Powertrain Control Module (PCM) Yes Yes

• Fuel Octane
• Tire/Wheel Size
• Axle Ratio
• Transmission Type
• 4x4 Present
• Manual Shift on the Fly

Configurable Modules - Excursion

• 4-wheel anti-lock brake (4WABS) control module (if equipped)
• vehicle security module
• overhead trip computer (OTC) (if equipped)
• 4-wheel drive control module
• driver seat module (DSM)
• instrument cluster

Hi , 7 bleeps is the throttle pot error , either a calibration problem or a faulty pot, i can help you , please contact me

Regards
Rob

www.gewizrepairs.co.uk

To start with, you didn't mention which computer you are talking about. WHAT 2003 comuter and WHAT 2006 computer? What are the part numbers and calibration codes on the computers in question? If the part numbers and calibration codes are the same, then they are the same. However, I think it very unlikely.

Automotive computers are kind-of like cell phones...they are out-dated and obsolete before you can walk out of the store with them.

They also vary from vehicle to vehicle built within the SAME year, depending on how the vehicle is equipped (engine size, transmission type, 2-wheel drive, 4-wheel drive, automatic climate control or manual climate control, heated seats, heated mirrors, Power windows, automatic suspension, etc., etc.).

All you need to do is measure the diameter and do the math or for precision, roll-out one revolution on the ground and measure it in millimeters and divide by 1.61 (or multiply times .621).

(Consult chart or figure yourself by measuring from the top of the tire to the ground in inches.) Measurement X 25.4 x 3.14 / 1.61 = ws ( / is divided by)

http://www.thisoldtractor.com/gtbender/mg_manuals/sigma_sport_bc1200.pdf

There's a chart in the link below. I believe Columns E and F apply.

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cyclecomputer-calibration.html#ccc

I wouldn't say it's a lack of the wheel being cheap I'd be more inclined to say it's "because" the wheel is cheap. Seriously, Have you tried to calibrate the wheel using the windows calibration routine found in your control panel under Game Controllers.

Obviously the wheel is operating but barly sorry, barely. That means it is working and giving input to your computer so if that input isn't enough you either need to calibrate in windows or maybe there's even a calibration routine in the game you're playing, maybe under options. Calibration by the way is found under properties on the Game Controller section. Try it.

The test section of the windows section will tell you just how far your wheel is turning or directing your cars by means of a box with a cross in it. The more you turn the wheel the further that cross will move. Test it first, then do the calibration and then test it again. I'm sure you'll see a big difference.

It is a 2 part install the sensor goes on the front wheel,(2 part) and the reciever goes on the handelbar.Some calibration my be required for accuracy by adjusting the sensor up or down the wheel.Check it by taking a known distance ride.Check signal by spinning wheel it works by mathematiclly counting the revolutions x wheel distance (you have to put in the tire size).Good Luck.

Hi jayster

Here are the configurations for your bc500 wheel size

Circumference in millimeters/1.6093;circumference in millimeters
Tire Size Miles Km
700 X 44 1382 2224
700 X 38 1355 2180
700 X 35 1347 2168
700 X 32 1339 2155
700 X 28 1327 2136
700 X 25 1308 2105
700 X 23 1302 2097
700 X 20 1296 2086
27 X 1 3/8 1349 2169
27 X 1 1/4 1343 2161
27 X 1 1/8 1339 2155
27 X 1 1333 2145
26 X 2.125 1286 2070
26 X 1.9 1276 2055
26 X 1.5 1234 1985
26 X 1.25 1213 1953
26 X 1.0 (559 mm) 1189 1913
26 x 1 (650C) 1213 1952
Wide Tubular 1316 2117
Narrow Tubular 1308 2105
26 X 1 3/8 1288 2068
24 1191 1916
24 x 1 1089 1753
20 X 1.75 (406) 927 1491
20 X 1 1/4 (451) 1005 1618
17 x 1 1/4 838 1325
16 x 1 3/8 797 1282

For other configurations check this site out and plese let me know if it was helpful .
LInk Site : http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cyclecomputer-calibration.html

You can download and print one from Document Capture Technologies site here: http://www.docucap.com/index.php?/downloads . Scroll down to the Travelscan 464/464M section and download the TS 464 Calibration Target for letter print size paper (PDF) or TS 464 Calibration Target for A4 print size paper (PDF) page.

Calibration problem on sigmatel s3