By man1 - usenet poster
Has anybody tried image stabalizing binoculars? I was not sure if this would
work for night sky oberserving although I have been thinking about getting a
pair for my use on my boat. Anyway, I saw an ad in Astronomy magazine for
Canon's image stabalizing binoculars and the ad was geared for moon gazing.
Thanks,
Ned
Best Solution
posted on Aug 01, 2007
lawyer - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
I've had Canon 12x36 stabilized binocs for several years. I have
never noticed any vibrations and have been delighted with them. I
mostly use them for terrestrial observation, and recently compared
them with the new Fujinon 15x40 IS which did have a slight constant
jitter. I wonder if the jitter occurs in the 15x but not the 12x? Or
is it a sample defect - do all the Fujinons have it?
The benefit of the Fujinons is that they stabilize through five
degrees as opposed to 1 degree for the Canon - but this is of no
interest in astronomical use, in fact it's annoying when you move the
Fujinons as the image is a bit sloshy in tracking.
I use lithium batteries from Radio Shack in my Canons - the battery
life is supposed to be about 7 times alkalines but they're expensive.
Rechargable is probably the best.
- Walt Bilofsky
never noticed any vibrations and have been delighted with them. I
mostly use them for terrestrial observation, and recently compared
them with the new Fujinon 15x40 IS which did have a slight constant
jitter. I wonder if the jitter occurs in the 15x but not the 12x? Or
is it a sample defect - do all the Fujinons have it?
The benefit of the Fujinons is that they stabilize through five
degrees as opposed to 1 degree for the Canon - but this is of no
interest in astronomical use, in fact it's annoying when you move the
Fujinons as the image is a bit sloshy in tracking.
I use lithium batteries from Radio Shack in my Canons - the battery
life is supposed to be about 7 times alkalines but they're expensive.
Rechargable is probably the best.
- Walt Bilofsky
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #2
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Bomber - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Image-stabilizing binoculars are fine for terrestrial use and
moon-watching. They have small exit pupils, so using them for general
star-gazing is not very good.
For the huge price premium you pay for the stabilization, you'd be
better off to get a decent pair of large binoculars and a compact
monopod.
moon-watching. They have small exit pupils, so using them for general
star-gazing is not very good.
For the huge price premium you pay for the stabilization, you'd be
better off to get a decent pair of large binoculars and a compact
monopod.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #3
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Janice - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Mike, have you ever tried the Sovietsky Collection stabilized binos?
#
No batteries, 16*50, work at any angle, long eye relief but they dont mention
weight..
See you at the WSP, if you are coming..
Herm
On 25 Dec 1999 03:07:30 GMT, (MHarveyWW1) wrote:
#
No batteries, 16*50, work at any angle, long eye relief but they dont mention
weight..
See you at the WSP, if you are coming..
Herm
On 25 Dec 1999 03:07:30 GMT, (MHarveyWW1) wrote:
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #4
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Bouncy - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
I've had my Canon 15 X 45 stabilized binocs for about a year now. When I
first got them I was annoyed by the recurrent vibrations in the stabilizing
prisms that cause star images to slightly blur every few seconds. In time I
came to realize that I was being overly critical - as the benefits of these
binoculars far outweigh any shortcomings in this area!
I have a shelf full of 'traditional' Nikon and Fujinon binoculars that are
now collecting dust since I acquired the Canons. I also sold my 16 X 70 Fujinon
FMT-SX's (which had heretofore been my all-time favorite astronomical
binoculars). The stabilizing effect of the Canons give them performance that
far exceeds what is normal for such an aperture. It's like having the
performance of a 70mm in a hand-held package!
Aside from the stabilizer... the optical quality of the Canons is just short
of the Fujinons and superior to most other top-of the-line models that I've
owned or used.
I use my dailyand that is the best endoresement I can think of.
PS - the battery 'problem' is not as severe as some have suggested. Use the
NIMH re-chargeables and you'll get several weeks of normal use before
recharging.
Mike Harvey
first got them I was annoyed by the recurrent vibrations in the stabilizing
prisms that cause star images to slightly blur every few seconds. In time I
came to realize that I was being overly critical - as the benefits of these
binoculars far outweigh any shortcomings in this area!
I have a shelf full of 'traditional' Nikon and Fujinon binoculars that are
now collecting dust since I acquired the Canons. I also sold my 16 X 70 Fujinon
FMT-SX's (which had heretofore been my all-time favorite astronomical
binoculars). The stabilizing effect of the Canons give them performance that
far exceeds what is normal for such an aperture. It's like having the
performance of a 70mm in a hand-held package!
Aside from the stabilizer... the optical quality of the Canons is just short
of the Fujinons and superior to most other top-of the-line models that I've
owned or used.
I use my dailyand that is the best endoresement I can think of.
PS - the battery 'problem' is not as severe as some have suggested. Use the
NIMH re-chargeables and you'll get several weeks of normal use before
recharging.
Mike Harvey
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #5
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Duke - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
1. They are like regular binoculars until you press the
stabilizaiton button. Then your shaky grip becomes less apparent.
2. The sales person did mention that although they stabilize
the battery life is not long so carry a pocket full of batteries if you
intend to use the stabilizaiton feature.
I bought regular binos and put them opn a tripod, eventually I graduated
to the trapezoidal mount so you can raise and lower them to suit your
comfrot level, and that of incidental observers. Frankly I think if I
was going to put in 400-600 bucks, I would go with some larger diameter
binos and resign myself to using a tripod.
Warren
--
email address:
stabilizaiton button. Then your shaky grip becomes less apparent.
2. The sales person did mention that although they stabilize
the battery life is not long so carry a pocket full of batteries if you
intend to use the stabilizaiton feature.
I bought regular binos and put them opn a tripod, eventually I graduated
to the trapezoidal mount so you can raise and lower them to suit your
comfrot level, and that of incidental observers. Frankly I think if I
was going to put in 400-600 bucks, I would go with some larger diameter
binos and resign myself to using a tripod.
Warren
--
email address:
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #6
posted on Aug 01, 2007
paulrmc - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Check Todd Gross's site for a review (#).
Check around before buying, the price varys a lot. I just bought a pair of
10x30's for my dad, the prices quoted ranged from $340 - $550.
Jim
Check around before buying, the price varys a lot. I just bought a pair of
10x30's for my dad, the prices quoted ranged from $340 - $550.
Jim
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Suggest a new solution for this problem
Post a New problem for Fuji Fujinon Polaris - Fujinon
Email this problem
Post a New problem for Fuji Fujinon Polaris - Fujinon
Email this problem
Can you Help with these Binoculars problems?
Repair Service
Find Binoculars Repairman Near You:

