On my visit to Banff last week, I lost a quick-release plate for my tripod head. This led me to the Banff camera shop and the eventual purchase of a new tripod and head combination for more than they were worth (a Bogen 190 CL and Compact Ball Head combo). The tripod and head worked well and I was generally pleased, but then I got an e-mail from one of the Ebay vendors, Amvona, from whom I bought some cheap (but decent quality) lightstands once with a link to the following:
#
I have purchased other Dynatran stuff in the past and found it to be generally good quality (not great or outstanding, but generally worth the lower price) and wonder if anyone here has any experience with their tripods or ball heads.
You can get it even cheaper if you buy it from them on ebay. Not directly from their ebay store on a "buy it now" but for a regular bid item. I got this set of legs for $ 20.50 # and this ball head for 21.00 #. At these prices, you can't go wrong. I never used a tripod before, if I find myself using this set-up more-and-more then maybe the time will come to pony up for a better quality setup. For the time being, this set-up will be fine.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
What amazes me is the great difference in steadiness when I compare set up tripods in a camera store. Some are really unsteady and others are much firmerI think I would make sure the one I was interested in was steady before I bought it. (Although the $113 price for that carbon fiber pod is so cheap that you can hardly go wrong by taking a chance.)
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
It's a nice adage, but I do get a free lunch every once in a while and I have a surprisingly good ball head that I paid $50 for new (different manufacturer). However, the price for just the tripod legs is $113, not exactly free. Realistically, the carbon fiber component of this tripod is probably 9 tubes in three sizes. What does that part of the tripod add to the cost of production? Years ago, anything CF was expensive. Now there are plenty of inexpensive items with CF components. Surely the cost of manufacturing CF stuff has come down. Why hasn't the cost of CF tripods come down? What exactly is so expensive about manufacturing the tripod if not CF tubes? The rest is just some machined metal parts. Is this a manufacturer that sees a way to market similar products at a significantly reduced price thanks to the cheaper availability of the same components, is it just a bunch of cheap crap or is it somewhere in between: a decent quality product but not the best?
Just some thoughts and general questions. One thing I did notice when I looked around that site some is that they have a taller aluminum tripod that actually weighs less than the CF one.
Oh, and did a quick search and see that I can buy all the CF tubes needed to make a tripod this height for about $75 retail. Surely a tripod manufacturer can get the tubes for a fourth of that price. Of course, this also begs the question about aluminum tripod prices too assuming that aluminum tubes are as dirt cheap as I imagine they must be.
Eric Miller #
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
That pretty well sums up my experience with that exact CF92 tripod. But it's only a good value if you have a clear understand what you are and are not buying.
I use it with a Markins Q3 head when I want to reduce my carry weight for occasional field and tourist use. This ain't a bargain Gitzo; its finish and finish are inline with the price you pay. I don't demand (nor would I expect) it to stand up to the day-to-day rigors of professional use.
I don't have one of their tripod heads, but they seem to be very similar to the Benro heads offered regularly on eBay.
-- Michael Benveniste -- Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $250. Use this email address only to submit mail for evaluation.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it: