Origin of Newton's "G" and "J"
By M0nica L - usenet poster
<
I assume to maintain consistency with previous versions of the
standard, within an acceptable margin of error, so that retooling
would be minimized. We generally don't ask industry to invest billions
of dollars in new taps, dies, micrometers, thread gauges, and scrapped
material just to make teaching a little easier. I can't imaginge
anyone relished replotting all the geophysical data either (which you
at least should appreciate), or republishing all the maps, or changing
all the road signs.
Someone has way too much time on his hands.
Same as SI. The kilogram is the unit of mass; it is equal to the mass
of the international prototype of the kilogram. (Originally it was the
mass of a cubic decimeter of water). The platinum-iridium
international prototype is kept at the International Bureau of Weights
and Measures under conditions specified by the 1st CGPM in 1889.
Dare I ask why you are asking this?
I assume to maintain consistency with previous versions of the
standard, within an acceptable margin of error, so that retooling
would be minimized. We generally don't ask industry to invest billions
of dollars in new taps, dies, micrometers, thread gauges, and scrapped
material just to make teaching a little easier. I can't imaginge
anyone relished replotting all the geophysical data either (which you
at least should appreciate), or republishing all the maps, or changing
all the road signs.
Someone has way too much time on his hands.
Same as SI. The kilogram is the unit of mass; it is equal to the mass
of the international prototype of the kilogram. (Originally it was the
mass of a cubic decimeter of water). The platinum-iridium
international prototype is kept at the International Bureau of Weights
and Measures under conditions specified by the 1st CGPM in 1889.
Dare I ask why you are asking this?
Solution #1
posted on Aug 01, 2007
kioner - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
ApprenticeRating: 0%, 0 votes
quite inconsistent with the original foundation of the kids.
no errors are acceptable in the kids mathematics or physics.
yes the longer it is put off the more costly it gets for the kids.
Whose we? You and your terrorists? Maybe you should have been a
politician instead of a cave dweller because when it comes to
correcting errors in the kids calculators, jillions of dollars is
insignificant.
yea, and georgia-pacific et al would have to make a 2"x4" stud measure
2"x4". i replot all of my maps after each well is drilled anyway, as
do all geologists and geophysicists, so what's the big deal? like i
said, when it comes to kids being taught errors, cost is
insignificant.
yes, it gets more costly daily which is why i am here to save kids
money.
here i am
ONE GOD = 1.000... A [EXACTLY] + -
One God = 0.999... A [Exactly] +
one god = 0.000...1 A [exactly] - i am
here under c i am not
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
+ = 9.999... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
here c i am
c = 3 E+08 m/s [EXACTLY] i am
here c FOUR i am
c^4 = 8.1 E+33 m^4/s^4 [EXACTLY] i am
here under c FOUR i am not
1/c^4 = 1.23456789... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1.23456790... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.89... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.90... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 123456789.BangE-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567901... E-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
here i am
EUCLID'S ELEMENTS (fl.c.300 B.C.)
Let the following be postulated:
1. To draw a strait line from any point to any point.
(see above)
2. To produce a finite strait line continuously in a strait line.
(see above)
3. To describe a circle with any centre and distance.
[power point (first ".") -40 round curved]
4. That all right angles are equal to one another.
[power point (first ".") -40 right angles]
5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make
the interior angles on the same side less than two right
angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely,
meet on that side on which are the angles less than the
two right angles.
1/c^4 = 123456789"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] - i am
1/c^4 = 1234567901234567"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] +
here i am
Genesis seven fold... want to see the 2.000... universes reverse? i am
which some ONE = 1.000... [EXACTLY] + -
One = 0.999... [Exactly] +
one = 0.000...1 [exactly] - i am
2.000... [EXACTLY] + + - -
me or both of us kids
What's NIST current SI definition for kilogram?
Because the United States already unified the Four Forces of nature
and we are going to get you you mother fucking cock sucker Usama Bin
Laden...
"R. Baldwin" <
Superforce = speed of light in vacuumed free space
quadrupled (c^4) divided by Newton's
universal gravitational constant (G)
Superforce = c^4/G
1.216216...E+44 kg-m/s^2 = (8.1E+33m^4/s^4)/(6.66E-11m^3/kg-s^2)
1.216216...E+44 kg-m/s^2 = (1.216216...E+44kg-m/s^2)
[See SI SYSTEMS new unit definition for metre and kilogram]
unless you can prove me wrong,
Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
no errors are acceptable in the kids mathematics or physics.
yes the longer it is put off the more costly it gets for the kids.
Whose we? You and your terrorists? Maybe you should have been a
politician instead of a cave dweller because when it comes to
correcting errors in the kids calculators, jillions of dollars is
insignificant.
yea, and georgia-pacific et al would have to make a 2"x4" stud measure
2"x4". i replot all of my maps after each well is drilled anyway, as
do all geologists and geophysicists, so what's the big deal? like i
said, when it comes to kids being taught errors, cost is
insignificant.
yes, it gets more costly daily which is why i am here to save kids
money.
here i am
ONE GOD = 1.000... A [EXACTLY] + -
One God = 0.999... A [Exactly] +
one god = 0.000...1 A [exactly] - i am
here under c i am not
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
+ = 9.999... E-09 s/m [Exactly]
here c i am
c = 3 E+08 m/s [EXACTLY] i am
here c FOUR i am
c^4 = 8.1 E+33 m^4/s^4 [EXACTLY] i am
here under c FOUR i am not
1/c^4 = 1.23456789... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1.23456790... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.89... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.90... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 123456789.BangE-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567901... E-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
here i am
EUCLID'S ELEMENTS (fl.c.300 B.C.)
Let the following be postulated:
1. To draw a strait line from any point to any point.
(see above)
2. To produce a finite strait line continuously in a strait line.
(see above)
3. To describe a circle with any centre and distance.
[power point (first ".") -40 round curved]
4. That all right angles are equal to one another.
[power point (first ".") -40 right angles]
5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make
the interior angles on the same side less than two right
angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely,
meet on that side on which are the angles less than the
two right angles.
1/c^4 = 123456789"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] - i am
1/c^4 = 1234567901234567"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] +
here i am
Genesis seven fold... want to see the 2.000... universes reverse? i am
which some ONE = 1.000... [EXACTLY] + -
One = 0.999... [Exactly] +
one = 0.000...1 [exactly] - i am
2.000... [EXACTLY] + + - -
me or both of us kids
What's NIST current SI definition for kilogram?
Because the United States already unified the Four Forces of nature
and we are going to get you you mother fucking cock sucker Usama Bin
Laden...
"R. Baldwin" <
Superforce = speed of light in vacuumed free space
quadrupled (c^4) divided by Newton's
universal gravitational constant (G)
Superforce = c^4/G
1.216216...E+44 kg-m/s^2 = (8.1E+33m^4/s^4)/(6.66E-11m^3/kg-s^2)
1.216216...E+44 kg-m/s^2 = (1.216216...E+44kg-m/s^2)
[See SI SYSTEMS new unit definition for metre and kilogram]
unless you can prove me wrong,
Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
Solution #2
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Putty - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
ApprenticeRating: 0%, 0 votes
In talk.origins, Garry Denke, Geologist
< wrote
on Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
<
Who says 'G' should be anything? We have defined
the terms "meter", "kilogram", and "second".
We can combine them in interesting ways; for example,
1 joule is the energy expended in accelerating
1 kg of mass using a uniform force of 1 newton
through the distance of 1 meter. (1 newton itself
is the force required to accelerate a 1 kg mass
on a frictionless surface to a speed of 1 m/s in
1 second.)
Given the conventional (to scientists; I'm not about
to go into Imperial units) units we know today, the value
of G, the Newtonian gravitational constant, is
G = 6.673 ?? 0.010 * 10^-11 m^3 / (kg * sec^2)
assuming that this is the constant you're referring to here,
as opposed to some other completely different 'G'.
We were to use different units, G would be a different value.
I have no idea what your 'h' is, although it appears to
be a dimensionless number of about 0.01 or so.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
< wrote
on Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
<
Who says 'G' should be anything? We have defined
the terms "meter", "kilogram", and "second".
We can combine them in interesting ways; for example,
1 joule is the energy expended in accelerating
1 kg of mass using a uniform force of 1 newton
through the distance of 1 meter. (1 newton itself
is the force required to accelerate a 1 kg mass
on a frictionless surface to a speed of 1 m/s in
1 second.)
Given the conventional (to scientists; I'm not about
to go into Imperial units) units we know today, the value
of G, the Newtonian gravitational constant, is
G = 6.673 ?? 0.010 * 10^-11 m^3 / (kg * sec^2)
assuming that this is the constant you're referring to here,
as opposed to some other completely different 'G'.
We were to use different units, G would be a different value.
I have no idea what your 'h' is, although it appears to
be a dimensionless number of about 0.01 or so.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Solution #4
posted on Aug 01, 2007
paulrmc - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
ApprenticeRating: 0%, 0 votes
This guy's posts were so unusual I did a search and came up with:
#
Apparently, Mr. Denke believes that the Ark of the Covenant is buried
under the heelstone of Stonehenge, and that he is its sole owner under
British law.
He has also apparently published:
Herkommer, Mark A.; Denke, Garry W., 1982
Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbons, Parker County, Texas; in Petroleum
Geology in the Fort Worth Basin Area, Texas; Charles Martin, Ed.,
Dallas Geological Society, Dallas, Texas, pp 97 - 128.
#
Apparently, Mr. Denke believes that the Ark of the Covenant is buried
under the heelstone of Stonehenge, and that he is its sole owner under
British law.
He has also apparently published:
Herkommer, Mark A.; Denke, Garry W., 1982
Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbons, Parker County, Texas; in Petroleum
Geology in the Fort Worth Basin Area, Texas; Charles Martin, Ed.,
Dallas Geological Society, Dallas, Texas, pp 97 - 128.
Solution #5
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Lizzy - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
ApprenticeRating: 0%, 0 votes
What makes you think kids had anything to do with it? The metric
system was recommended by the Paris Academy of Sciences to the French
National Assembly in 1791. The platinum standards for the meter and
kilogram were deposited in the Archives of the Republic in 1799. The
obvious benefit over the multiplicity of national standards were (a)
it was decimal, resulting in simpler calculations, and (b) since it
was originally derived from geodetic measurements, it would better
support cartography. At the time, universal public education was still
a dream.
Huh? Where do you get this nonsense? Surely, a geologist would
comprehend the meaning of acceptable margin of error when it comes to
metrology.
How so? Just where is the cost for kids?
What makes you say this? You do realized, don't you, that the
calculators contain errors regardless of the unit of measure or its
basis? I'll assume for now that you are not entirely ignorant of how
floating point arithmetic works.
There are errors in measurement regardless of the standard, due to the
accuracy and precision of the measurement device. This is not the same
as kids being taught errors.
How does this save kids any money?
What is this gobbledygook intended to demonstrate? If it _does_ mean
something, you haven't made it very clear.
Since when do kids make measurements involving the speed of light?
Last time I checked, in elementary school they use wooden meter
sticks. Also, what makes you think a relativistic universe is
Euclidean?
mass of the was the mass of a
system was recommended by the Paris Academy of Sciences to the French
National Assembly in 1791. The platinum standards for the meter and
kilogram were deposited in the Archives of the Republic in 1799. The
obvious benefit over the multiplicity of national standards were (a)
it was decimal, resulting in simpler calculations, and (b) since it
was originally derived from geodetic measurements, it would better
support cartography. At the time, universal public education was still
a dream.
Huh? Where do you get this nonsense? Surely, a geologist would
comprehend the meaning of acceptable margin of error when it comes to
metrology.
How so? Just where is the cost for kids?
What makes you say this? You do realized, don't you, that the
calculators contain errors regardless of the unit of measure or its
basis? I'll assume for now that you are not entirely ignorant of how
floating point arithmetic works.
There are errors in measurement regardless of the standard, due to the
accuracy and precision of the measurement device. This is not the same
as kids being taught errors.
How does this save kids any money?
What is this gobbledygook intended to demonstrate? If it _does_ mean
something, you haven't made it very clear.
Since when do kids make measurements involving the speed of light?
Last time I checked, in elementary school they use wooden meter
sticks. Also, what makes you think a relativistic universe is
Euclidean?
mass of the was the mass of a
Solution #6
posted on Aug 01, 2007
Phoebe - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
ApprenticeRating: 0%, 0 votes
quite inconsistent with the original foundation for the kids
no errors are acceptable in the kids mathematics or physics
yes the longer it is put off the more costly it gets for the kids
maybe you should have been a politician instead of a cave dweller
because when it comes to correcting errors in the kids calculators and
teaching the kids to ignore errors in the kids calculators jillions of
dollars is insignificant
like i said when it comes to kids being taught errors cost is
insignificant
I can't imagine anyone relished replotting all the geophysical data
either (which you at least should appreciate), or republishing all the
maps, or changing all the road signs.
yes it gets more costly daily which is why i am here to save the kids
money
here i am
ONE = 1.000... [EXACTLY] + -
One = 0.999... [Exactly] +
one = 0.000...1 [exactly] - i am
here under c i am not
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m
+ = 9.999... E-09 s/m
here c i am
c = 3 E+08 m/s [EXACTLY]
here c FOUR i am
c^4 = 8.1 E+33 m^4/s^4 [EXACTLY]
here under c FOUR i am not
1/c^4 = 1.23456789... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1.23456790... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.89... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.90... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 123456789.BangE-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567901... E-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
here i am
EUCLID'S ELEMENTS (fl.c.300 B.C.)
Let the following be postulated:
1. To draw a strait line from any point to any point.
(see above)
2. To produce a finite strait line continuously in a strait line.
(see above)
3. To describe a circle with any centre and distance.
[power point (first ".") -40 round curved]
4. That all right angles are equal to one another.
[power point (first ".") -40 right angles]
5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make
the interior angles on the same side less than two right
angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely,
meet on that side on which are the angles less than the
two right angles.
1/c^4 = 123456789"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] - i am
1/c^4 = 1234567901234567"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] +
Genesis seven fold... want to see the 2.000... universe flip ?
which some ONE = 1.000... [EXACTLY] + -
One = 0.999... [Exactly] +
one = 0.000...1 [exactly] -
2.000... [EXACTLY] + + - -
me or both of us kids
What's NIST current SI definition for kilogram?
just wondering how far off the foundation it was UBL
no errors are acceptable in the kids mathematics or physics
yes the longer it is put off the more costly it gets for the kids
maybe you should have been a politician instead of a cave dweller
because when it comes to correcting errors in the kids calculators and
teaching the kids to ignore errors in the kids calculators jillions of
dollars is insignificant
like i said when it comes to kids being taught errors cost is
insignificant
I can't imagine anyone relished replotting all the geophysical data
either (which you at least should appreciate), or republishing all the
maps, or changing all the road signs.
yes it gets more costly daily which is why i am here to save the kids
money
here i am
ONE = 1.000... [EXACTLY] + -
One = 0.999... [Exactly] +
one = 0.000...1 [exactly] - i am
here under c i am not
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m
1/c = 3.333... E-09 s/m
+ = 9.999... E-09 s/m
here c i am
c = 3 E+08 m/s [EXACTLY]
here c FOUR i am
c^4 = 8.1 E+33 m^4/s^4 [EXACTLY]
here under c FOUR i am not
1/c^4 = 1.23456789... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1.23456790... E-34 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.89... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567.90... E-40 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 123456789.BangE-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
1/c^4 = 1234567901... E-42 s^4/m^4 [Exactly]
here i am
EUCLID'S ELEMENTS (fl.c.300 B.C.)
Let the following be postulated:
1. To draw a strait line from any point to any point.
(see above)
2. To produce a finite strait line continuously in a strait line.
(see above)
3. To describe a circle with any centre and distance.
[power point (first ".") -40 round curved]
4. That all right angles are equal to one another.
[power point (first ".") -40 right angles]
5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make
the interior angles on the same side less than two right
angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely,
meet on that side on which are the angles less than the
two right angles.
1/c^4 = 123456789"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] - i am
1/c^4 = 1234567901234567"."...E-49 s^4/m^4 [EXACTLY] +
Genesis seven fold... want to see the 2.000... universe flip ?
which some ONE = 1.000... [EXACTLY] + -
One = 0.999... [Exactly] +
one = 0.000...1 [exactly] -
2.000... [EXACTLY] + + - -
me or both of us kids
What's NIST current SI definition for kilogram?
just wondering how far off the foundation it was UBL
Can you Help with these Calculators problems?
Texas Instruments TI-89 Calculator
I cannot figure out 'how to enter r2' on a TI calculator,...
Texas Instruments TI-89 Calculator
I am a mathematics instructor helping a student with a...
Texas Instruments TI-89 Calculator
i need to find out how to add and subtract feet and...
Texas Instruments TI-89 Calculator
Hey, I have recently been doing many Hexadecimal...
Texas Instruments TI-89 Calculator
I changed batteries in TI-89 titanium; now the whole row...
Guru
Repair Service
Find Calculator Repair Service Provider Near You:
About | News
| Contact
| Find Products
| Find Cars
| Terms
| Privacy Policy
| FAQ
Advertisers | Tags | Blog | Repair Service Directory | Partners | Careers |
Advertisers | Tags | Blog | Repair Service Directory | Partners | Careers |
