I have installed NetBSD 1.5.2 on a Compaq 12LX125 Laptop. The driver for the ether net pcmcia card I have seems to recognize the card, but then issues a 'where did the card go' failure message. I've rebuilt the kernel from the CD sources, with the same effect.
The card inquestion is a Linksys PCMCIA card with does both 10 and 100 base T.
In the FreeBSD environment I had to change a config line in some file but I don't see a similar sort of config for pcmcia devices under NetBSD.
I'm currently downloading the CVS source set to see if there's some difference.
But if someone has recent experiences and successfull one's I'd like to hear about that.
Am Freitag den, 11. Januar 2002, um 09:36, schrieb Manuel Bouyer:
I don't know if you caught my follow up post which indicated that I was able to get an older Linksys card working. The problem card is a "EtherFast 10/100 PC Card" (Model: PCMPC100).
I will have to review my steps on FreeBSD to see if I can find the info. I installed it, got it working, and then set up Mandrake Linux, as that was recommended for an 'easy install' to get X working. I did that, and have a config file, so now I'm going back to NetBSD...
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on Problems installing 1.5.2 on a Compaq 12LX125:
Solution #3
posted on May 28, 2006
Joey2 - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Am Freitag den, 11. Januar 2002, um 06:07, schrieb :
(problem in dock'ed pcmcia card...)
Well, further occluding, and a not so satisfactory fix...
I took the card out and the silkscreen indicated that the card's real name is 'EtherFast 10/100 PC Card" (model number PCMPC100.
I had an older 10 base T card which has on it's silkscreen, 'Ethernet Combo Card', (combo here means has a coax spigot and a RJ45 connector).
That one actually works. So my current thought is that while the driver recognises the existence of the card, from the pcmcia probe, there is some difference in registers or values in registers which later cause the attach to fail. I'll look into that later.
Thanks John Clark
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it: