By jessie25 - usenet poster
I would very much appreciate any experience (or info)
anyone has with Zoom Binoculars, but I'm mainly interested in
the Celestron 8-24x50mm Pro Series zooms, on paper they seem
to be better than Minolta's Standard 8-20x50mm zooms &
Tasco's Futura LE 9-27x50mm's . Thanks!
Dave Whitehurst
Solution #1
posted on May 26, 2006
paulrmc - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Floyd D. Whitehurst () wrote:
: I would very much appreciate any experience (or info)
: anyone has with Zoom Binoculars, but I'm mainly interested in
: the Celestron 8-24x50mm Pro Series zooms, on paper they seem
: to be better than Minolta's Standard 8-20x50mm zooms &
: Tasco's Futura LE 9-27x50mm's . Thanks!
I've had two pairs of zoom binoculars, and what the other people
have posted in the thread is correct--the more that moves, the more that
will (Not *can*, *will*) break. The first pair twitched out of alignment
on a trip (fortunately when I was coming home).
That being said, I'm happy with the pair I have now, the Tasco
Futura 9-27x50. *But* they are my at-home binoculars. They stay in the
house most of the time, and the yard the rest of the time.
I find zoom handy, but for more than backyard birding, stick with
non-zoom binoculars and a good spotting scope.
--
Jason Short Nothing is impossible.
Some things are just trickier than others.
: I would very much appreciate any experience (or info)
: anyone has with Zoom Binoculars, but I'm mainly interested in
: the Celestron 8-24x50mm Pro Series zooms, on paper they seem
: to be better than Minolta's Standard 8-20x50mm zooms &
: Tasco's Futura LE 9-27x50mm's . Thanks!
I've had two pairs of zoom binoculars, and what the other people
have posted in the thread is correct--the more that moves, the more that
will (Not *can*, *will*) break. The first pair twitched out of alignment
on a trip (fortunately when I was coming home).
That being said, I'm happy with the pair I have now, the Tasco
Futura 9-27x50. *But* they are my at-home binoculars. They stay in the
house most of the time, and the yard the rest of the time.
I find zoom handy, but for more than backyard birding, stick with
non-zoom binoculars and a good spotting scope.
--
Jason Short Nothing is impossible.
Some things are just trickier than others.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #2
posted on May 26, 2006
herself - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
In article: <43aspq$@dub-news-svc-1.compuserve.com>
(Floyd D. Whitehurst) writes:
-> I would very much appreciate any experience (or info)
-> anyone has with Zoom Binoculars, but I'm mainly interested in
-> the Celestron 8-24x50mm Pro Series zooms, on paper they seem
-> to be better than Minolta's Standard 8-20x50mm zooms &
-> Tasco's Futura LE 9-27x50mm's . Thanks!
Dave
Don't go for zooms. I ignored advice when I started birding about 5 years ago and bought a
pair of 7-35x50 Bressners. Only on odd occasions did I find the zoom useful (up to 15x),
when I didn't have the scope with me. Disadvantages:
1) VERY narrow field of view - I was struggling to get onto birds which others found with no
problem.
2) More mechanical parts to go wrong
3) No-one would accept a trade in when I'd had enough of the things.
I've now got 10x42 Swarovski Habichts and would never go back to zooms - and I use the
scope less!
Do what I didn't - listen to advice!!
==
Ian Traynor | Strategic Marketing Consultants
Traynor Kitching & Associates |
Osbaldwick, York, UK | FREE on-line consultancy on our
email: | 'Marketing Magic!' Web Page:
Tel/Fax (+44) (0) 1904 424 832 | #
|
"If you don't know where you're going, any road will do!"
==
(Floyd D. Whitehurst) writes:
-> I would very much appreciate any experience (or info)
-> anyone has with Zoom Binoculars, but I'm mainly interested in
-> the Celestron 8-24x50mm Pro Series zooms, on paper they seem
-> to be better than Minolta's Standard 8-20x50mm zooms &
-> Tasco's Futura LE 9-27x50mm's . Thanks!
Dave
Don't go for zooms. I ignored advice when I started birding about 5 years ago and bought a
pair of 7-35x50 Bressners. Only on odd occasions did I find the zoom useful (up to 15x),
when I didn't have the scope with me. Disadvantages:
1) VERY narrow field of view - I was struggling to get onto birds which others found with no
problem.
2) More mechanical parts to go wrong
3) No-one would accept a trade in when I'd had enough of the things.
I've now got 10x42 Swarovski Habichts and would never go back to zooms - and I use the
scope less!
Do what I didn't - listen to advice!!
==
Ian Traynor | Strategic Marketing Consultants
Traynor Kitching & Associates |
Osbaldwick, York, UK | FREE on-line consultancy on our
email: | 'Marketing Magic!' Web Page:
Tel/Fax (+44) (0) 1904 424 832 | #
|
"If you don't know where you're going, any road will do!"
==
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Solution #3
posted on May 26, 2006
kioner - usenet poster
Rank:
Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Hello Dave
I just bought (three months ago) my fifth pair of bins (binoculars). If
only I had known better in the beginning, I could have saved a lot of
money, and bad birding experiences.
First you need to know how serious you are into birding. If you have just
started, it could be a fad. But if you can tell that you will forever be
birding, at least once a year on vacation, it is worth some serious
investment.
My first pair were Bushnell Zoom x35. I will never get zoom bins again,
for that matter a zoom camera lens as well. The simple logic applies, the
more that moves, the more that can break. They gave me many hours of
hellish birding. I didn't realise how crappy they were until I looked
through my friend's Nikons.
Take my advice, get out of the under 200 US range. Planned obsolescence is
rampant is this area. And stay away from old East German or Russian bins.
My friends still chuckle over my Russian 7x50 that I had to bang against a
tree to get the lens in the right position.
I have been relatively happy with Nikon bins. I think for the money the
Japanese Camera companies make some desent mid range bins- after all they
should know lenses.
I now have a pair of Leica and am one happy bugger. But the investment
will only pan out if they last me three years, and that will be a new
record.
Bon Chance
A.Bennett Hennessey
I just bought (three months ago) my fifth pair of bins (binoculars). If
only I had known better in the beginning, I could have saved a lot of
money, and bad birding experiences.
First you need to know how serious you are into birding. If you have just
started, it could be a fad. But if you can tell that you will forever be
birding, at least once a year on vacation, it is worth some serious
investment.
My first pair were Bushnell Zoom x35. I will never get zoom bins again,
for that matter a zoom camera lens as well. The simple logic applies, the
more that moves, the more that can break. They gave me many hours of
hellish birding. I didn't realise how crappy they were until I looked
through my friend's Nikons.
Take my advice, get out of the under 200 US range. Planned obsolescence is
rampant is this area. And stay away from old East German or Russian bins.
My friends still chuckle over my Russian 7x50 that I had to bang against a
tree to get the lens in the right position.
I have been relatively happy with Nikon bins. I think for the money the
Japanese Camera companies make some desent mid range bins- after all they
should know lenses.
I now have a pair of Leica and am one happy bugger. But the investment
will only pan out if they last me three years, and that will be a new
record.
Bon Chance
A.Bennett Hennessey
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Suggest a new solution for this problem
Post a New problem for Tasco 20x50mm Compact w/ Car Window
Email this problem
Post a New problem for Tasco 20x50mm Compact w/ Car Window
Email this problem
Can you Help with these Spotting Scopes problems?
Repair Service
Find Spotting Scope Repairman Near You:

