Question about 2002 Honda Accord
You would have to replace the whole regulator. The motor itself would not have to be replaced. But it might not hurt to replace them as a unit since it would be apart already. It is a little more expensive to do this but you would have a warranty then. If you are having it repaired at a shop, and you replace the regulator only, 2 weeks down the road and the motor goes out, your going to have to pay labor again for basically the same job. My advice is, if you can afford too, replace it as a whole unit. If not, replace just the regulator and hope the motor doesn't go bad.
Posted on Mar 17, 2011
Save hours of searching online or wasting money on unnecessary repairs by talking to a 6YA Expert who can help you resolve this issue over the phone in a minute or two.
Best thing about this new service is that you are never placed on hold and get to talk to real repairmen in the US.
Here's a link to this great service
Posted on Jan 02, 2017
Tips for a great answer:
Mar 19, 2016 | Dodge Cars & Trucks
Feb 25, 2015 | Cars & Trucks
Feb 17, 2015 | 2005 GMC Envoy
Apr 27, 2011 | Saab 9 3 Cars & Trucks
Jan 07, 2018 | 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor
Jul 13, 2010 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Feb 26, 2010 | 2005 Dodge Dakota
Feb 19, 2010 | 1999 Dodge Grand Caravan
Oct 24, 2009 | 2001 Buick LeSabre
Mar 31, 2009 | 2001 Toyota Corolla
154 people viewed this question
Usually answered in minutes!