I am currently leasing a 1994 Mercury Villager, but my lease is about up and I'm thinking about purchasing/leasing a 97 Caravan/Voyager because the price is much less than the 97 Villager. Are these good vans? I've heard alot of awful things that have gone wrong with late model (and for that matter, even older) Chrysler vehicles. 'Anyone have any experience with these models?
My family purchased a Grand Voyager last September. It was the 97 model year and the base model with the driver side sliding door. It had ABS cuz all Voyagers have it standard. Also, we got the 3.3L V6 with the infamouse 4-speed auto.
Anyway, I must admit the fit and finish is not first class, but it was on par with my expectations for the price we paid for the car. Everything has worked relatively well. There were a few problems (defective rear suspension were making noises so it was replaced free of charge, and one of the tires were damaged due to road hazard so we are now using the full size spare.)
Overall, the van is a very convenient, does its task very well. Never had a problem with the tranmission. The van has about 16K miles on it now and it shifts better than the 94 Lexus GS300 my father drives. The tranny has been virtually bulletproof for now, we've driving from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, San Francisco, San Diego (more than 10 times) under heavy and light loads and the car performed flawlessly.
That said, the 3.3L doesn't give you a lot of high end power, just tons of low end torque so freeway passings take a while. The transmission develops a high pitched whinning sound when driving from 70-80mph, and the steering wheel has a clicking sound when it's turned. These are all annoyances and nobody seems to know what to do about them. Even Chrysler has no idea how to fix the whinning sound. I've been lazy about taking the van in for the clicking sound from the steering wheel cuz it's not really THAT annoying and I heard it was a simple fix so I'm saving it for a weekend.
It's an average van, but an above average value. The Toyota Previa we looked at were $10K more than we paid for the Voyager. It's a terrific people/stuff hauler.
It's your choice. Read the reviews and test drive one yourself. With the incentives going on right now, this van is a great deal.
Alex
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #2
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
My 1990 Voyager started whining about 2-3000 miles. Took it to the dealer who said they all did it (he let me drive a demo which did it also) and said it was due to the straight cut (as opposed to helical) gears. That never bothered me much. When the tranny failed and left me stranded (3 weeks ago at 96K miles), now that bothered me. I have seen recent Chrysler warranty data that indicates the 4 speed tranny (no called 41TE instead of A604) was their #1 warranty problem in 1996 running 4.5 repairs/100 vehicles. That's a horrendous number in the auto industry.
Lee --
Remove .nospam to reply.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #3
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
We have a 96 Voyager . So far we love it . Only have about 8K on it but it's one of the few new vehicles that I have not had to take back to the dealer for one thing or another . If you are looking at the short versions I highly reccomend getting the 3.0 V6 with the 3 speed automatic . The 4 speeds reputation is less than stellar even after 9 years in production . You won't miss the extra gear , it will cruise all day at 70 mph and not even breathe hard . The 4 speed still seems to be the weak spot on the minvans or even the cars for that matter except the Neon which runs the 3 speed auto . Nicest riding vehicle I have owned . Hopefully the reliability will be ok as I did not get any extended coverage for it . So far so good with the van.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #4
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Deven, If you're looking for a cost-effective people hauler that out-slicks a Cadillac for comfort and a Z-28 for handling, one of these Chryco vans could have your name on it. I'm now using a Grand Caravan with the "performance" suspension package with 16" wheels, etc. for my personal company car, and with the exception of one glitch with wipers, have been more pleased with this vehicle than any in recent experience. We operate from the Texas hill country near Austin which is blessed with roads ranging from intestates to serious twist. One of my boy-racer engineers has a '96 Z-28 which can't keep up with this "pod" on the back roads, and from my personal comparative experience with a Cadillac caterra, the caravan has better creature comforts for long-haul "doing-business-en-route" work.
Gas mileage stays above 20 mpg until in excess of 90 mph and if you can find places sufficiently devoid of fuzz the thing will run at 100 mph on cruise for hours and live through it. The Michelin MXV4 OEM tires aren't happy going faster than 90. Even with pressures ~38-40 psi still shake going fast indicating shape change.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #5
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
All I can say is don"t buy a Chrysler. I have had 2 Town and Countries and the one I have had now, a 1996 has given me nothing but problems. They company also does not back up their product and this is the most frustrating part. If you can handle very frequent trips to the shop, then chrysler/ Dodge may be for you.
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #6
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
In article < 1997 15:54:45 GMT, RMP0747 said...
Well, let me just say that internet-savvy prospective car buyers like myself comb these newsgroups for complaints and compliments like these. We're all real people with real problems and solutions. What better way to synergize experiences by sharing them with others that are looking for information?
-EJ
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #7
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
I am sure you, and many others do comb these newsgroups - afterall, I did the same thing when I was ready to order my '96 T&C LXi. The one thing I have learned - and you will have to agree - is that more people are going to take the time to post something negative rather than something positive. I will also add that in the past, when I have posted something positive, I have been referred to as either a "shill" for ChryCo or on their payroll. Go figure!
R. Phillips
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #8
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Well, Jennifer
My comment is DO buy a Chrysler. I had a '92 T&C and noe have a '96 T&C LXi. Over the 4 years I had the T&C it was in the shop 4 times. The first two times were minor warranty repairs. The third time was to replace a switch in the ABS (71,000 miles). The fourth time was when a pump went out in the 4-speed tranny (72,000 miles) so the tranny had to be repaired (it did NOT self-destruct like the experiences of some in this newsgroup). I have had the '96 for 15 months and it now has 31,000 miles on it. The rear brakes were upgraded per TSB at 4,600 miles. The windshield wiper switch was replaced per TSB at 29,000 miles (it would have been sooner my my dealer accomodated me adn my schedule). Other than that I have had no problems. We also had a '93 LeBaron LX convertible which had to have an electronic module replaced in the first week and never had anything else go wrong with it in the 54,000 miles we had it (we traded it and the '92 T&C for the '96 as I now have a company supplied vehicle and we felt we did not have to have one vehicle sitting in the garage 90% of the time). And, speaking of company supplied vehicle, it is a '96 Dodge Caravan SE. I took possession of it in January of this year when my counterpart retired. At the time it had 18,000 miles and it now had 33,000 miles. Befeore I got it the gas tank was replaced per TSB. The rear brakes had to be upgraded but, as the van had 26,000 miles on it, Chrysler would not fix per TSB and the lesing company had to pay for it. Chrysler has stood behind each and every one of these vehicles 100% (except for the brakes on the SE - for which I do not blame them) and they have given my wife and me complete satisfaction. I am sorry you have had problems - but there are many people out here who have not (and very few of them take the time to read this newsgroup - or even know of that it exists!).
R. Phillips
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it:
Show your appreciation by commenting on '97 Caravan/Voyager-Good Buy?:
Solution #9
posted on May 14, 2008
kioner - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice Rating: 0%, 0 votes
My $0.02 worth
Buy the Chrysler minivan.
These are the BEST vans on the road. If they were not, why has Chrysler sold more vans in on year than all the other manufacturer's put together. Why is it that Chrysler comes up with new ideas and all the other mini-vans copy them!!! I have always been a Chevy person. I thought I would never own a Chrysler after the crap they put out 10 years ago. That was a long time ago. But the new cars & vans are different. Almost going out of business was the best thing for CC. They have learned to build cars, trucks & vans the way people want... They are a new car company today. Yea there are problems. But have you driven a FORD lately or experienced the GM's... They have the exact problems, IF NOT MORE. Jap cars is a totally different situation, but the japs don't make vans worth a shit. If you want American made mini-van. Stick with the experts. I have a 97 Dodge Grand Caravan ES 6 months old with 7,000 miles on it and have "0" problems with it. It has every option Dodge had except all wheel drive. I'm sure I will have problems, but all cars do. Even the BMW's have problems.
The comfort, ride, apperance, driveability, durability, etc. of the Chrysler mini-vans are the best in the pack.
Go Figure!
Was this solution helpful? Show your Appreciation by rating it: