Perkins - usenet poster
Rank: Apprentice
Rating: 0%, 0 votes
Hi, I'm a new Echo owner (sedan) in Vancouver.
I'm getting the same mileage (auto transmission) as you. Closer to 9
per 100 kms, not 7.1 But it's still too early to tell, I think, as I've
barely driven a little more than two tanks of gas, and measuring it as
best I can, going to the same pump at the same gas station, etc
Today I ran my concerns past the parts manager at the dealership I
bought the car from. He explained that ALL auto manufacturers use
"idealized" test conditions, i.e. simply putting the car on a dynameter
(sp?) and setting it at 50 kms (city) or 100 (hwy)
Obviously this can't be a realistic way of doing it, but it must be
legal...
Anyway, I'm going to wait and see how it all averages out over the first
couple thousand kms. It strikes me that the real complaint should be to
government, which allows such generalized methods of measuring fuel
efficiency. It kind of makes me wonder how they actually do this -- do
they take the "idealized" results and then subtract a litre or two to
make it close to real?
The same parts manager told me that the break-in period is between 800
and 1000 kms, and that I "might" notice better fuel economy thereafter.
Anyone here have any experiences along these lines? The last time I
bought a new car was so long ago, gas wasn't even a concern (cheap old
days!)
Here's an interesting article about the same issue, but from a British
website -- notice the shocking disparity in their findings on the Prius'
fuel stats.
Cheers,
RB